After taking some time to reply to the parents of a small child who had voiced concerns over the suspension of presenter Huw Edwards, the BBC issued an apology.
In July, the business examined its complaints process.
The BBC has not addressed allegations that it paid a 17-year-old for graphic sexual pictures since 2020.
His husband said the newscaster was hospitalized for a “serious episode.” If he was well, she would “respond to the stories that have been published”.
BBC COO Leigh Tavaziva labeled Edwards’ claim “specific process shortcomings” Tuesday. For not reporting the initial matter to management sooner, she apologized to the complaint.
Huw Edwards hosted News at Ten for 20 years, covering Queen Elizabeth II’s death. Office staff are investigating any critical comments he made against the BBC.
After Deloitte partner Simon Cuerden found a “clear need for greater consistency across the BBC” in its policies, processes, and understanding for processing the most serious complaints, the BBC said that it would enhance its non-editorial complaint procedures.
On May 18, BBC corporate investigations called the complaint at “a BBC location in Cardiff.” According to the BBC, the issue was not “escalated,” “meaning that there was no opportunity for wider visibility of the case within the organization.”
Read More
When the initial contact failed, there was confusion because there was no contact plan or follow-up.This aids the BBC’s “escalation mechanism.”
The poll found that a lot of workers were “nervous” about making complaints.
Those who voice their complaints more often are more inclined to resolve the conflict with a different employee or specialist.
“A well-known presenter” promised a 20-year-old crack addict “more than £35,000 since they were 17 in return for sordid images.”
Parents reported to BBC in May that they never heard back. According to corporate investigations, BBC CEO Tim Davie said the complaint contained no “allegation of criminality” in May.
In July, the defendant’s early-20s lawyer told the BBC that the charges were “rubbish.” and that “nothing inappropriate” had happened.
“To avoid any doubt, nothing improper or illegal has occurred between our client and the BBC personality, and the allegations published in The Sun newspaper are baseless,” the lawyer said.
After contacting the complainant’s relatives, the BBC never received a response. The BBC ran a poorly done follow-up on June 6.
On July 6, the BBC closed the station due to “new allegations” that the director general and executive directors were not “made aware” of. The presenter was suspended on July 9 after the SCMF was enacted on July 7.
Share this content:
One Comment